
De-Escalation and the Next Phase of AI
PRIVATE WEALTH Weekly Update: De-Escalation and the Next Phase of AI March 11, 2026 This week, markets moved on a de-escalation that mattered more
This week, markets notched fresh highs, and what stands out is how much of the action is being driven not just by earnings or economic data but by courtrooms. It is rare to see so many legal decisions, both concluded and ongoing, impacting the markets. The Fed Put has returned as the centerpiece of investor psychology, but the courts have added their own unexpected backstop. It is a reminder that markets do not move on a single narrative; they are stitched together by overlapping stories, each reinforcing the idea that someone, somewhere, will keep the floor from collapsing.
Start with the Fed Put itself. Investors have come to believe that when conditions weaken, the Federal Reserve will be there to ease policy, just as it has in every major downturn of the past three decades. Friday’s weak jobs report fed directly into that expectation. The Wall Street Journal reported only 107,000 new jobs were created in the last four months—an average of 27,000. Monthly job gains averaged 167,000 last year. Industries with high tariff exposure shed workers, and manufacturing jobs have declined by about 78,000 over the past year. The manufacturing payrolls have fallen for four straight months. Energy prices have dropped, and so has the need for oil and gas jobs. Construction job growth has also taken a hit from the immigration crackdown, which is creating labor shortages. This could eventually affect manufacturing if there are more raids like the one at Hyundai’s factory complex in Georgia, where federal agents arrested hundreds of South Korean workers. It was described as the largest single-site enforcement action since the big immigration raids of 2006. Another reason for slow job growth is that companies are not hiring new workers but instead becoming more productive from gains made in AI. The clearest sign of this is in the unemployment rate for 16–24 year olds, which is elevated at about 10.8%. Even though the job market has slowed, workers are demanding more in wages than the average being offered. With high prices you don’t necessarily need inflation at this point because people will substitute. We are seeing this in people trading down and more people shopping in discount stores.
This data has resulted in traders now pricing in rate cuts coming faster and possibly deeper than previously thought. The political backdrop only intensifies this perception. On Thursday, the Justice Department opened a criminal investigation into Fed Governor Lisa Cook. If she is forced out, President Trump could appoint a replacement and shift the balance of power at the central bank. The possibility of a Trump-aligned Fed majority has markets assuming easier policy is not just a cyclical adjustment but a structural reality. In other words, the safety net is pushing stocks higher even though job growth has slowed considerably. My only reservation is if other Fed governors start to think politically in their votes given that other members have been attacked and forced to be removed. I’d imagine there is the potential for gamesmanship and politics coming into play.
The courts are also reshaping trade policy in real time. An appeals court ruled that Trump’s tariffs exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a judgment that effectively returned tariff power to Congress. The administration has now appealed to the Supreme Court, with Solicitor General John Sauer pushing for an accelerated November hearing. That speed is extraordinary for a case of this scope, and it highlights the stakes: billions of dollars in collected duties, ongoing global negotiations, and the broader precedent of whether the president can use emergency powers to set sweeping trade terms. Trump’s legal team has warned of economic “catastrophe” if the tariffs are scrapped, with the potential of refund obligations to importers. For investors, the outcome could ripple into corporate costs, consumer prices, and global supply chains. Here again, the gavel is as powerful as any Fed chair’s remarks. I expect that even if Trump loses the Supreme Court case he will find other ways to tariff companies. We have already seen him take a 10% stake in Intel and tax NVIDIA chips in China by taking a portion of the profits. There is much more to come on what happens next and how it impacts business.
The courts also had a major impact on the technology sector this week. A federal judge ruled that Google could keep its Chrome and Android businesses intact, avoiding the corporate breakup that critics had demanded. But the court did not let Google walk away untouched. It required the company to share certain search data with competitors and to end the exclusivity deals that made Google the default search engine on Safari and other browsers. The decision also preserved Google’s ability to continue its estimated $20 billion-a-year revenue-sharing arrangement with Apple, a deal that ensures Google’s dominance on iPhones. The ruling was seen as a win for tech investors.
Taken all this news together and a pattern emerges. The Fed Put is alive because weak data invites easier money. The tariff fight underscores how legal decisions can either disrupt global trade or leave the status quo intact. And the Google ruling shows that even when regulators impose limits, companies still can win in the courts. Lower rates are making dividend stocks and growth names more attractive. Refinancing costs will drop if the Fed delivers cuts, freeing up cash for households and corporations alike. And the belief that courts and policymakers will step in encourages investors to buy dips rather than sell into fear. Interest rates are too high and restrictive and the Fed is behind the curve in cutting rates. It has taken three months of bad unemployment numbers to make them move. If they don’t cut rates at least a few times now it will look like it’s more about politics than what should happen.
This is how rallies can continue. Lower interest rates make stocks more attractive and investors better buy longer maturity bonds before those higher rates disappear. This backdrop creates uncertainty and massive money movements into alternatives and hedges if inflation returns later after the Fed cuts rates. Usually the Fed isn’t cutting rates when markets are near all-time highs and margin debt is over $1 trillion and investors are speculating in gold, cryptocurrencies and options. The markets are already ahead of the Fed. With trillions still sitting in money markets, investors know those interest payments will fall once rate cuts arrive. At that point, conservative investors or those worried about recession and inflation will face a choice: pay up for expensive stocks or accept lower income. For the past year it has been easy to earn a return regardless of risk level, but those days may be ending.
Have a great weekend!
1. Wall Street Journal: Reported 107,000 new jobs created in the last four months (average of 27,000).
2. Labor Data: Manufacturing jobs declined by 78,000 over the past year; unemployment rate for 16–24 year olds is at 10.8%.
3. Department of Justice: Opened criminal investigation into Fed Governor Lisa Cook.
4. Federal Appeals Court: Ruled Trump’s tariffs exceeded authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
5. Federal Court Ruling: Google allowed to keep Chrome/Android intact; confirmed $20 billion revenue-sharing deal with Apple.
The information provided in this communication is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. All content is based on data and sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Market conditions and economic factors are subject to rapid change. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other agency, organization, employer, or company. Investors should conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The author may hold positions in securities mentioned in this post.

PRIVATE WEALTH Weekly Update: De-Escalation and the Next Phase of AI March 11, 2026 This week, markets moved on a de-escalation that mattered more

PRIVATE WEALTH Weekly Update: Markets Bounce on Hope, But Oil Will Decide What’s Next April 4th, 2026 This week, markets rebounded after comments from

PRIVATE WEALTH Weekly Update: Markets Reprice a Longer Conflict March 28, 2026 This week, markets spent time trying to price a conflict with no

PRIVATE WEALTH Weekly Update: No Clear Endgame: How the Iran War Is Forcing a Market Repricing March 21st, 2026 This week served as a

PRIVATE WEALTH Weekly Update: The Energy Choke Point: Geopolitics, Oil, and the Path to Market Recovery March 14th, 2026 This week, I wanted to

PRIVATE WEALTH Weekly Update: Rising Oil, Falling Jobs: A Complicated Week for Markets March 7th, 2026 This week it was a combination of the war
Disclosures
The information presented here is for informational purposes only, and this document is not to be construed as an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, securities. Constant Guidance Financial is not an accounting firm or legal firm; no portion of this content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. Some investments are not suitable for all investors, and there can be no assurance that any investment strategy will be successful. Charts, graphs, and visual illustrations are provided for educational purposes only and should not be relied upon as accurate representations of current market data.
The hyperlinks included in this message provide direct access to other Internet resources, including Web sites. While we believe this information to be from reliable sources, Constant Guidance Financial is not responsible for the accuracy or content of information contained in these sites.
Although we make every effort to ensure these links are accurate, up to date and relevant, we cannot take responsibility for pages maintained by external providers. The views expressed by these external providers on their own Web pages or on external sites they link to are not necessarily those of Constant Guidance Financial.